I wonder if there’s potential

I’m drafting v 2 of JPEG: The Quadruple Object and have been revisiting the concept of potentiality and objects, notably Levi Bryant’s debate with Graham Harman. This is the latest musing… if anyone can see any great glaring holes, mis-representations or even molten cores worth expanding… Levi Bryant, a strong advocate of objects as the …

A bit of new year carpentry: Ekaw Snagennif

As you may know, I’m engaging in a bit of my practice-research around object-oriented photography and publishing on/in/through Facebook. Using my favourite new camera (the screengrab facility on my phone), I’m ‘taking’ photos of the images in the Haystack, uploading them back into the space (where they JPEG-encoded as visible images). I’m (re)mixing these with …

Not answers but… a response to Jussi’s OOQ

Jussi Parikka poses some interesting question about OOP. I’m fortunate enough to have Jussi as my  PhD supervisor and so the poor guy has 70 thousand words of OOP musing to wade through over his Christmas break so maybe he’s getting in his objections early… So in that spirit, my thoughts about his questions. Firstly he says: …

I formally object

Victor Burgin identifies two “pitfalls awaiting the art theorist with no grasp of semiology, ‘the temptation to treat the work of art as a purely formal construction’ [… and a] focus[..] on the internal life of the autonomous object”{%Burgin 1986@1} Burgin picks up on a powerful tradition of anti-formalism that arguably has a new relevance …